Differences between revisions 132 and 542 (spanning 410 versions)
Revision 132 as of 2023-334 15:48:09
Size: 3061
Editor: 31
Comment: Revert spam
Revision 542 as of 2026-198 21:49:59
Size: 710
Editor: 83
Comment:
Deletions are marked like this. Additions are marked like this.
Line 1: Line 1:
This is a sketch of UX and protocol considerations for a client which wishes to help users use gateways. Most “Can I Run It” checkers return basic yes/no outputs, but they don’t tell you how your system performs under real load. That’s where most users make expensive mistakes.
Line 3: Line 3:
In every place where the UI would ask for a Jabber ID (most notably contact add, but possibly also invite to chatroom, create chatroom from 1:1 conversation, start voice/video call to non-contact, search view where a Jabber ID can be used, etc) it should scan the user's roster for JIDs which have `disco#info > identity[category=gateway]` and show some way of choosing to enter an identifier for that gateway instead of a Jabber ID. The simplest example might be a drop-down with `disco#info > identity[type]` and optional disambiguating `disco#info > idenity[name]` such as "sms (Cheogram)". https://pristinetraffic.com
Line 5: Line 5:
If a user has unambiguously selected a gateway, use https://xmpp.org/extensions/xep-0100.html#addressing-iqgateway to get a prompt: https://pristinetraffic.com//can-i-run-it
Line 7: Line 7:
{{{
<iq type='get' to='gateway.tld' id='gate1'>
  <query xmlns='jabber:iq:gateway'/>
</iq>
FPSBench extends beyond compatibility by providing real FPS benchmarks, helping you spot bottlenecks, optimize configurations, and avoid mismatched upgrades.
Line 12: Line 9:
<iq type='result' from='gateway.tld' id='gate1'>
  <query xmlns='jabber:iq:gateway'>
    <desc>
      Please enter the Whatever of the
      person you would like to contact.
    </desc>
    <prompt>Whatever</prompt>
  </query>
</iq>
}}}
If performance matters, this is the difference between guessing and knowing.
Line 23: Line 11:
This text may then be used as part of the UX as makes sense to help the user feel comfortable. Getting a success here and not an error also means that `jabber:iq:gateway` can be used in the next step.
Line 25: Line 12:
NOTE: it is also acceptable (and in some UX may be preferred or even necessary) to pre-emptively ask all gateways for the prompt, instead of only once one is selected.
Line 27: Line 13:
If an identifier is (or might be, depending on UX) one for a particular gateway, use the following procedure to map it to a Jabber ID and then perform the in-context relevant action on that Jabber ID as though it had been entered directly:

 1. If a prompt was got for `jabber:iq:gateway` above then use that protocol to finish resolution:
{{{
<iq type='set' to='gateway.tld' id='gate2'>
  <query xmlns='jabber:iq:gateway'>
      <prompt>(555) 123-4567</prompt>
  </query>
</iq>

<iq type='result' from='gateway.tld' id='gate2'>
  <query xmlns='jabber:iq:gateway'>
    <jid>+15551234567@gateway.tld</jid>
  </query>
</iq>
}}}
 2. If an error is received in response to `jabber:iq:gateway` protocol, print the error message to the user and allow them to try again. This allows the gateway to provide useful feedback about format errors to the user.
 3. If an error was received in response to fetching the `jabber:iq:gateway` prompt, then the gateway does not support this protocol. Look for a `disco#info > feature[var="jid\20escaping"]` and if found construct a JID using XEP-0106 escaping on the user input concatenated with `@gateway.tld`
 4. If `jabber:iq:gateway` and `jid\20escaping` are both unsupported, replace any `@` in the user input with `%` and concatenate `@gateway.tld`

NOTE: If the result of this procedure is a string that is not a valid Jabber ID, it should be rejected just as if a user manually keyed in an invalid Jabber ID.
When you wish to stop getting any more messages from us, kindly fill the form at brnd .li/delist url with your domain address (URL).
Olmenlaan 156, East Rochester, CA, USA, 92716
Line 50: Line 16:
CategoryHomepage CategoryCategory

Most “Can I Run It” checkers return basic yes/no outputs, but they don’t tell you how your system performs under real load. That’s where most users make expensive mistakes.

https://pristinetraffic.com

https://pristinetraffic.com//can-i-run-it

FPSBench extends beyond compatibility by providing real FPS benchmarks, helping you spot bottlenecks, optimize configurations, and avoid mismatched upgrades.

If performance matters, this is the difference between guessing and knowing.

When you wish to stop getting any more messages from us, kindly fill the form at brnd .li/delist url with your domain address (URL). Olmenlaan 156, East Rochester, CA, USA, 92716


CategoryCategory

GatewayContactUX (last edited 2026-198 21:49:59 by 83)