Diff for "GatewayContactUX"

Differences between revisions 21 and 475 (spanning 454 versions)

Hi !,

Are you tired of bulky bags?

Meet our newest unisex backpack — engineered for practicality and style.

🧠 Why it's different: - Tons of smart storage spaces - Physiological curve back system for all-day comfort - Smooth-grip handle + durable zipper closure - Dedicated compartments for your tech gear and daily essentials - Stylish solid pattern design — goes with any outfit or setting - Made for everyone — ideal for both men and women

Whether you're commuting, traveling, or just staying organized, this backpack has you covered.

🛒 Shop now: ➡️ [https://bagpackmoda.com/](https://bagpackmoda.com/)

Looking forward to helping you travel smarter!

Best regards, BagPackModa Support

-  ⇤ ← Revision 21 as of 2022-345 23:00:32 → 
  Size: 6255
  Editor: bras-base-ktnron060cw-grc-05-184-144-81-134
  Comment: revert spam
+   ← Revision 475 as of 2025-103 15:06:23 → ⇥
  Size: 736
  Editor: ip187
  Comment:
-Deletions are marked like this.
+Additions are marked like this.
 Line 1:
----- /!\ '''Edit conflict - other version:''' ----
#format wiki
+Hi !,
-Line 4:
+Line 3:
-This is a sketch of UX and protocol considerations for a client which wishes to help users use gateways.
+Are you tired of bulky bags?
-Line 6:
+Line 5:
-In every place where the UI would ask for a Jabber ID (most notably contact add, but possibly also invite to chatroom, create chatroom from 1:1 conversation, start voice/video call to non-contact, search view where a Jabber ID can be used, etc) it should scan the user's roster for JIDs which have `disco#info > identity[category=gateway]` and show some way of choosing to enter an identifier for that gateway instead of a Jabber ID.  The simplest example might be a drop-down with `disco#info > identity[type]` and optional disambiguating `disco#info > idenity[name]` such as "sms (Cheogram)".
+Meet our newest unisex backpack — engineered for practicality and style.
-Line 8:
+Line 7:
-If a user has unambiguously selected a gateway, use https://xmpp.org/extensions/xep-0100.html#addressing-iqgateway to get a prompt:
+🧠 **Why it's different:**
- Tons of smart storage spaces
- Physiological curve back system for all-day comfort
- Smooth-grip handle + durable zipper closure
- Dedicated compartments for your tech gear and daily essentials
- Stylish solid pattern design — goes with any outfit or setting
- Made for everyone — ideal for both men and women
-Line 10:
+Line 15:
-{{{
<iq type='get' to='gateway.tld' id='gate1'>
  <query xmlns='jabber:iq:gateway'/>
</iq>
+Whether you're commuting, traveling, or just staying organized, this backpack has you covered.
-Line 15:
+Line 17:
-<iq type='result' from='gateway.tld' id='gate1'>
  <query xmlns='jabber:iq:gateway'>
    <desc>
      Please enter the Whatever of the
      person you would like to contact.
    </desc>
    <prompt>Whatever</prompt>
  </query>
</iq>
}}}
+🛒 Shop now:
➡️ [https://bagpackmoda.com/](https://bagpackmoda.com/)
-Line 26:
+Line 20:
-This text may then be used as part of the UX as makes sense to help the user feel comfortable.  Getting a success here and not an error also means that `jabber:iq:gateway` can be used in the next step.
+Looking forward to helping you travel smarter!
-Line 28:
+Line 22:
-NOTE: it is also acceptable (and in some UX may be preferred or even necessary) to pre-emptively ask all gateways for the prompt, instead of only once one is selected.

If an identifier is (or might be, depending on UX) one for a particular gateway, use the following procedure to map it to a Jabber ID and then perform the in-context relevant action on that Jabber ID as though it had been entered directly:

 1. If a prompt was got for `jabber:iq:gateway` above then use that protocol to finish resolution:
  {{{
<iq type='set' to='gateway.tld' id='gate2'>
  <query xmlns='jabber:iq:gateway'>
      <prompt>(555) 123-4567</prompt>
  </query>
</iq>

<iq type='result' from='gateway.tld' id='gate2'>
  <query xmlns='jabber:iq:gateway'>
    <jid>+15551234567@gateway.tld</jid>
  </query>
</iq>
}}}
 2. If an error is received in response to `jabber:iq:gateway` protocol, print the error message to the user and allow them to try again.  This allows the gateway to provide useful feedback about format errors to the user.
 3. If an error was received in response to fetching the `jabber:iq:gateway` prompt, then the gateway does not support this protocol.  Look for a `disco#info > feature[var="jid\20escaping"]` and if found construct a JID using XEP-0106 escaping on the user input concatenated with `@gateway.tld`
 4. If `jabber:iq:gateway` and `jid\20escaping` are both unsupported, replace any `@` in the user input with `%` and concatenate `@gateway.tld`

NOTE: If the result of this procedure is a string that is not a valid Jabber ID, it should be rejected just as if a user manually keyed in an invalid Jabber ID.

---- /!\ '''Edit conflict - your version:''' ----
#format wiki

This is a sketch of UX and protocol considerations for a client which wishes to help users use gateways.

In every place where the UI would ask for a Jabber ID (most notably contact add, but possibly also invite to chatroom, create chatroom from 1:1 conversation, start voice/video call to non-contact, search view where a Jabber ID can be used, etc) it should scan the user's roster for JIDs which have `disco#info > identity[category=gateway]` and show some way of choosing to enter an identifier for that gateway instead of a Jabber ID.  The simplest example might be a drop-down with `disco#info > identity[type]` and optional disambiguating `disco#info > idenity[name]` such as "sms (Cheogram)".

If a user has unambiguously selected a gateway, use https://xmpp.org/extensions/xep-0100.html#addressing-iqgateway to get a prompt:

{{{
<iq type='get' to='gateway.tld' id='gate1'>
  <query xmlns='jabber:iq:gateway'/>
</iq>

<iq type='result' from='gateway.tld' id='gate1'>
  <query xmlns='jabber:iq:gateway'>
    <desc>
      Please enter the Whatever of the
      person you would like to contact.
    </desc>
    <prompt>Whatever</prompt>
  </query>
</iq>
}}}

This text may then be used as part of the UX as makes sense to help the user feel comfortable.  Getting a success here and not an error also means that `jabber:iq:gateway` can be used in the next step.

NOTE: it is also acceptable (and in some UX may be preferred or even necessary) to pre-emptively ask all gateways for the prompt, instead of only once one is selected.

If an identifier is (or might be, depending on UX) one for a particular gateway, use the following procedure to map it to a Jabber ID and then perform the in-context relevant action on that Jabber ID as though it had been entered directly:

 1. If a prompt was got for `jabber:iq:gateway` above then use that protocol to finish resolution:
  {{{
<iq type='set' to='gateway.tld' id='gate2'>
  <query xmlns='jabber:iq:gateway'>
      <prompt>(555) 123-4567</prompt>
  </query>
</iq>

<iq type='result' from='gateway.tld' id='gate2'>
  <query xmlns='jabber:iq:gateway'>
    <jid>+15551234567@gateway.tld</jid>
  </query>
</iq>
}}}
 2. If an error is received in response to `jabber:iq:gateway` protocol, print the error message to the user and allow them to try again.  This allows the gateway to provide useful feedback about format errors to the user.
 3. If an error was received in response to fetching the `jabber:iq:gateway` prompt, then the gateway does not support this protocol.  Look for a `disco#info > feature[var="jid\20escaping"]` and if found construct a JID using XEP-0106 escaping on the user input concatenated with `@gateway.tld`
 4. If `jabber:iq:gateway` and `jid\20escaping` are both unsupported, replace any `@` in the user input with `%` and concatenate `@gateway.tld`

NOTE: If the result of this procedure is a string that is not a valid Jabber ID, it should be rejected just as if a user manually keyed in an invalid Jabber ID.

---- /!\ '''End of edit conflict''' ----
+Best regards,
BagPackModa Support