Differences between revisions 42 and 52 (spanning 10 versions)
Revision 42 as of 2022-364 04:19:45
Size: 1407
Editor: unn-37-19-221-33
Comment:
Revision 52 as of 2023-050 17:54:49
Size: 3053
Editor: root
Comment: Spam
Deletions are marked like this. Additions are marked like this.
Line 1: Line 1:
I noticed that you had an online business and are probably paying to much to market your online business and run it online, So I decided to submit a message in your contact form on your website to tell you about a new system that has it all.. #format wiki
Line 3: Line 3:
You no longer have to combind many websites or apps together to run your business this new system called Systeme has it all -> https://systeme.io/?sa=sa0066048964ce083bd3ae80d5a5c9afad6453879b This is a sketch of UX and protocol considerations for a client which wishes to help users use gateways.
Line 5: Line 5:
Systeme has an unimted plan which includes unlimited features like: In every place where the UI would ask for a Jabber ID (most notably contact add, but possibly also invite to chatroom, create chatroom from 1:1 conversation, start voice/video call to non-contact, search view where a Jabber ID can be used, etc) it should scan the user's roster for JIDs which have `disco#info > identity[category=gateway]` and show some way of choosing to enter an identifier for that gateway instead of a Jabber ID. The simplest example might be a drop-down with `disco#info > identity[type]` and optional disambiguating `disco#info > idenity[name]` such as "sms (Cheogram)".
Line 7: Line 7:
- Unlimited contacts
- Unlimited emails sent
- Unlimited sales funnels
- Unlimited courses
- Unlimited students
- Unlimited custom domains
- Unlimited A/B tests
- Unlimited file storage space
- Unlimited evergreen webinars
- Unlimited blogs
- Unlimited workflows
- Unlimited Coupon code
- Unlimited automation rules
If a user has unambiguously selected a gateway, use https://xmpp.org/extensions/xep-0100.html#addressing-iqgateway to get a prompt:
Line 21: Line 9:
I really believe in this new platform and for $97 a month it's Magic and a great deal becuase other email marketing compines without all these features want to charge $3,000 to send emails alone or more. {{{
<iq type='get' to='gateway.tld' id='gate1'>
  <query xmlns='jabber:iq:gateway'/>
</iq>
Line 23: Line 14:
Click the link to try ststeme -> https://systeme.io/?sa=sa0066048964ce083bd3ae80d5a5c9afad6453879b <iq type='result' from='gateway.tld' id='gate1'>
  <query xmlns='jabber:iq:gateway'>
    <desc>
      Please enter the Whatever of the
      person you would like to contact.
    </desc>
    <prompt>Whatever</prompt>
  </query>
</iq>
}}}
Line 25: Line 25:
I dont want to spam. I just wanted to help out if you do not want me to contact your contact fourm send me a email with your domain and I will not contact you again to "remove+bernardopalos2000@gmail.com" This text may then be used as part of the UX as makes sense to help the user feel comfortable. Getting a success here and not an error also means that `jabber:iq:gateway` can be used in the next step.
Line 27: Line 27:
From
Bernardo Palos
----
CategoryHomepage
NOTE: it is also acceptable (and in some UX may be preferred or even necessary) to pre-emptively ask all gateways for the prompt, instead of only once one is selected.

If an identifier is (or might be, depending on UX) one for a particular gateway, use the following procedure to map it to a Jabber ID and then perform the in-context relevant action on that Jabber ID as though it had been entered directly:

 1. If a prompt was got for `jabber:iq:gateway` above then use that protocol to finish resolution:
  {{{
<iq type='set' to='gateway.tld' id='gate2'>
  <query xmlns='jabber:iq:gateway'>
      <prompt>(555) 123-4567</prompt>
  </query>
</iq>

<iq type='result' from='gateway.tld' id='gate2'>
  <query xmlns='jabber:iq:gateway'>
    <jid>+15551234567@gateway.tld</jid>
  </query>
</iq>
}}}
 2. If an error is received in response to `jabber:iq:gateway` protocol, print the error message to the user and allow them to try again. This allows the gateway to provide useful feedback about format errors to the user.
 3. If an error was received in response to fetching the `jabber:iq:gateway` prompt, then the gateway does not support this protocol. Look for a `disco#info > feature[var="jid\20escaping"]` and if found construct a JID using XEP-0106 escaping on the user input concatenated with `@gateway.tld`
 4. If `jabber:iq:gateway` and `jid\20escaping` are both unsupported, replace any `@` in the user input with `%` and concatenate `@gateway.tld`

NOTE: If the result of this procedure is a string that is not a valid Jabber ID, it should be rejected just as if a user manually keyed in an invalid Jabber ID.

This is a sketch of UX and protocol considerations for a client which wishes to help users use gateways.

In every place where the UI would ask for a Jabber ID (most notably contact add, but possibly also invite to chatroom, create chatroom from 1:1 conversation, start voice/video call to non-contact, search view where a Jabber ID can be used, etc) it should scan the user's roster for JIDs which have disco#info > identity[category=gateway] and show some way of choosing to enter an identifier for that gateway instead of a Jabber ID. The simplest example might be a drop-down with disco#info > identity[type] and optional disambiguating disco#info > idenity[name] such as "sms (Cheogram)".

If a user has unambiguously selected a gateway, use https://xmpp.org/extensions/xep-0100.html#addressing-iqgateway to get a prompt:

<iq type='get' to='gateway.tld' id='gate1'>
  <query xmlns='jabber:iq:gateway'/>
</iq>

<iq type='result' from='gateway.tld' id='gate1'>
  <query xmlns='jabber:iq:gateway'>
    <desc>
      Please enter the Whatever of the
      person you would like to contact.
    </desc>
    <prompt>Whatever</prompt>
  </query>
</iq>

This text may then be used as part of the UX as makes sense to help the user feel comfortable. Getting a success here and not an error also means that jabber:iq:gateway can be used in the next step.

NOTE: it is also acceptable (and in some UX may be preferred or even necessary) to pre-emptively ask all gateways for the prompt, instead of only once one is selected.

If an identifier is (or might be, depending on UX) one for a particular gateway, use the following procedure to map it to a Jabber ID and then perform the in-context relevant action on that Jabber ID as though it had been entered directly:

  1. If a prompt was got for jabber:iq:gateway above then use that protocol to finish resolution:

    • <iq type='set' to='gateway.tld' id='gate2'>
        <query xmlns='jabber:iq:gateway'>
            <prompt>(555) 123-4567</prompt>
        </query>
      </iq>
      
      <iq type='result' from='gateway.tld' id='gate2'>
        <query xmlns='jabber:iq:gateway'>
          <jid>+15551234567@gateway.tld</jid>
        </query>
      </iq>
  2. If an error is received in response to jabber:iq:gateway protocol, print the error message to the user and allow them to try again. This allows the gateway to provide useful feedback about format errors to the user.

  3. If an error was received in response to fetching the jabber:iq:gateway prompt, then the gateway does not support this protocol. Look for a disco#info > feature[var="jid\20escaping"] and if found construct a JID using XEP-0106 escaping on the user input concatenated with @gateway.tld

  4. If jabber:iq:gateway and jid\20escaping are both unsupported, replace any @ in the user input with % and concatenate @gateway.tld

NOTE: If the result of this procedure is a string that is not a valid Jabber ID, it should be rejected just as if a user manually keyed in an invalid Jabber ID.

GatewayContactUX (last edited 2024-324 15:10:43 by ip119)